I appreciate that this is likely to be read as a massive attack on the Welfare State by some, and that I’ll be suspected of channeling the political spirits of Norman Tebbit, Margaret Thatcher and Atilla the Hun by others. However, that’s not the intention. As some of you will know, I hold Libertarian views and am a believer in as small a Government as is practicable, but that does not mean that I take the view that the State should not intervene to help those in genuine need.
This entry grew out of the ongoing study-tidying process that’s been going on for a few weeks now here at the Towers. I came across a newspaper article that I’d clipped in June of this year, and in the article was an interesting observation from William Beveridge – the architect of the modern UK Welfare State. In 1948, 6 years after he originally wrote the report that gave ultimately gave birth to the benefits system, he expressed his fear that the reforms he’d introduced might encourage people to be passive about their needs.
The Government of the day didn’t take his words on board; the rest, as they say, is history, and we’re now able to look at the society that was created and wonder whether the result of 65 years of cradle to grave Welfare State has been, in the words of the journalist Camilla Cavendish who wrote the piece, to reduce people to a bundle of needs.
And I agree with her; one of the side effects of the Welfare State, especially in the increasingly Nannyish manner that it has been implemented in the last 12 years, is that many people have been dumped in to a dependency culture. The risk to entitlements and benefits if a job is taken means that many people are not going to run the risk of taking a job that will result in them losing money from their weekly income – and I can see their point. For all the talk of dignity of work, self respect, etc. the bottom line is that if you don’t have as much money coming in to the household then, in the words of Quark, the ferengi bartender from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine – “Dignity and an empty sack is worth the sack”.
In 2007, roughly a third of all Government expenditure was in the from of State Benefits. This constituted around 11% of GDP, and about half of the population of the UK were recipients of some form of state benefits. Now, we live in a system where inevitably some people are going to slip to a point where they need state intervention to keep a roof over their heads. And it’s appropriate that they get that help. But half the country? This is obviously not half the households; many households on benefits slip will involve a number of adults. Some households can’t get much help at all; anyone who runs their own business or is self-employed will understand that if their business hits trouble they are very much on their own unless children are involved.
But for those households and individuals who are dependent on benefits, and in many cases have their whole lifestyle driven by the need to maintain their access to the benefits system, let’s take a look at what this means:
- There are restrictions on paid and voluntary work that can be done whilst claiming benefits. In other words, you are effectively being paid to do nothing for part of your week.
- The crossover between benefits and work is fraught with problems – it’s very easy to get a nice little job and lose out bigtime in the ancillary benefits that your household may be entitled to.
- The problems in moving in to and out of benefits – as may take place if you do contract / temporary work or find yourself on a series of short term contracts (not uncommon in a recession when piece work may be increasingly common) again discourages people from stepping out of the benefits pit to seek ongoing work.
- Some people with occasional illness that will prevent them working for a month or so here, a month or so there, again find it easier to stay on sickness and disability benefits rather than step in and out of the workforce and lose the regularity of cashflow of being on benefits.
There are some people for whom a loosening of the restrictions around working whilst on benefits would be a great advantage. For example, allowing someone on benefits to do a paid job for a couple of months without losing access to benefits might seem strange, but think about what it would permit:
- Ongoing guaranteed income over the first month or so when pay in a new job may not be immediately available.
- No sudden shock to the family finances.
- The work is bringing in extra money for a month or so – it is worth doing.
- At the end of this period then the benefits can be stopped.
There are people for whom this sort of movement in and out of the workforce would never be possible, due to illness or disability, and it should therefore be possible to allow them to do voluntary work / temporary work as required again with no financial loss.
This would require a synchronising of the Tax and Benefits system. And the Government would also need to make it very clear (and structure tax and benefit regimes accordingly to ensure it) that if you wanted to sit on your backside you could do, but that your income would be less than someone on benefits who is working as and when they can.
The aim is to encourage self-value, self-determination and get out of the need trap. We cannot carry on like we are doing producing multiple generations of families in which no one has worked. This is wrong, it’s perverse and we simply cannot afford it financially or as a society.
One of my interests is in GIS systems – Geographical Information Systems – and other aspects of computerised and online mapping. Thanks to Googlemaps, it’s been possible for developers to create map-driven applications for nothing – Google allows access to their mapping infrastructure free for many applications, and it’s brilliant. To anyone who hasn’t taken a look or had a play, have a look at
A little while ago I turned the TV on to get the lunchtime news, and was staggered to find Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on 3 BBC Channels – BBC News, BBC Parliament and BBC 2 – and also on Sky news. I took a look at what was going on, and was seriously unimpressed. There’s a line in an old Billy Bragg song that refers to ‘those braying voices on the right of the House’ and it’s as relevant today as it ever was, with the exception that the braying voices now seem to come from all sides of the House.
Well, both
Here’s a quick hint for anyone who’s had the ‘can’t access empty property’ or ‘unknown property’ error in a WordPress Plugin (or the core WordPress installation) , here’s a quick fix to try before starting to tear your hair out. The error manifests itself with messages such as ‘Cannot access empty property in … ‘ or some similar wording. 
So I started eagerly looking forward to the magic day in October when the clocks went back. The day when 11-30 at night really was 2330 hrs GMT. The project to hear North America was on! The radio I was using was a nice enough receiver but the frequency markings were pretty inaccurate. This was in the days before digital readouts – as you turned the tuning control a rather clever contraption of pulleys, springs and string moved a pointer across a long glass ‘dial’ with wavelength markings on it, which I then converted to frequency. In order to ‘home in’ on CJYQ it was necessary to find a couple of easily identifiable European stations just above and just below the frequency for CJYQ, as there was no way I could tune the receive to it’s operating frequency directly.
I’ve just upgraded various blogs I look after – including my own – to WordPress 2.8.5.